Víctor Serrano - Differences in the Force-Velocity profile between

Journal article

J. P. Párraga Montilla, P. L. Latorre Román, Victor Serrano Huete, José Carlos Cabrera Linares, Emilio D. Lozano Aguilera, Pedro Jiménez Reyes
Physical Activity Review, 2022

Semantic Scholar DOI

Cite

APA Click to copy
Montilla, J. P. P., Román, P. L. L., Huete, V. S., Linares, J. C. C., Aguilera, E. D. L., & Reyes, P. J. (2022). Differences in the Force-Velocity profile between Judoist and freestyle wrestlers. Physical Activity Review.

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Montilla, J. P. Párraga, P. L. Latorre Román, Victor Serrano Huete, José Carlos Cabrera Linares, Emilio D. Lozano Aguilera, and Pedro Jiménez Reyes. “Differences in the Force-Velocity Profile between Judoist and Freestyle Wrestlers.” Physical Activity Review (2022).

MLA Click to copy
Montilla, J. P. Párraga, et al. “Differences in the Force-Velocity Profile between Judoist and Freestyle Wrestlers.” Physical Activity Review, 2022.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{j2022a,
  title = {Differences in the Force-Velocity profile between Judoist and freestyle wrestlers},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Physical Activity Review},
  author = {Montilla, J. P. Párraga and Román, P. L. Latorre and Huete, Victor Serrano and Linares, José Carlos Cabrera and Aguilera, Emilio D. Lozano and Reyes, Pedro Jiménez}
}

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to gain new knowledge about the force-velocity (F-V) profile in Judoist and freestyle wrestlers, investigating if there were any differences between sports and which physical demands have which fighting modalities. Participants: 24 athletes (male) took part in this study. Twelve Judoist (age: 20.3 ± 3.9 years, weight: 76.4 ± 10.4 kg; height: 179.4 ± 5.3 cm; BMI: 32.2 ±1.9 kg/m2) and twelve freestyle wrestlers (age: 19.6 ± 4.5 years, weight: 65.3 ± 13.6 kg; height: 177.5 ±5.7 cm; BMI: 23.8 ± 1.8 kg/m2) participated. Methods: To evaluate the F-V profile, the participants performed a squat jump (SJ) without load, as well as with different load conditions (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of athlete’s body mass). To assess the height of the jump, the OptoGait system was used. Consequently, the theoretical maximal force (F 0); the theoretical maximal velocity (V 0); maximal mechanical power output (Pmax); slope of the linear F-V relationship (Sfv); optimal F-V profile (Sfvopt ); and the differences between Sfv and Sfvopt (FV imb% ) were obtained. Results: A higher F 0 and lower V 0 were found in Judo athletes compared to wrestlers. Significant differences were found in Sfv and FV imb (p<0.001). Conclusion: The F-V profile is an accurate, reliable, and economical method that facilitates the evaluation of the current state of the athlete individually. Practical applications: The F-V profile method allows coaches and athletes to adjust their training objectives to achieve a higher level in their sport.